.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

arnold palmer hospital building

arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%



  • gr8tfly
    Jan 25, 06:35 PM
    MacWorld, quarterly report and market in general. Expectations of MacWorld beyond reality and can't top iPhone. Quarterly report also not up to predictions, most of which were not from Apple. The rest was tracking the market, in general (compare today's chart for AAPL with the Dow).

    Good time to buy, from what I can see. Actually bought more, myself.





    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%



  • Full of Win
    Apr 22, 06:01 PM
    What features would those be, smart guy?

    Inductive charging via the Touchstone base.

    http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/palm_touchstone_pre.jpg





    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%



  • Force10
    Apr 22, 04:58 PM
    Well, Rumors I hear suggest this may be a new iPhone but not the new iPhone.
    Cook said he wanted a more affordable one. What better than an iPod Touch that can make calls if you buy credit on a pay-as-you go basis?
    This will have A4, 4-8GB, retina res but not IPS and sell for under $200 with no contract.
    Existing Touch will be replaced by a 5-6" game-centric model with A5 and 1024 x 768 retina screen.





    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%



  • Digital Skunk
    Apr 24, 04:13 PM
    All we need now is an iPhone worthy of Sprint's network.

    4.3" screen

    NO buttons

    etc. . . . . you know . . . an EVO that runs iOS.

    Or, the app makers that I've been bugging for years can just port to Android, then I and many other would be happy campers.



    more...


    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%



  • lordonuthin
    Nov 30, 06:13 PM
    i recently got a ps3 slim, does ps3 folding rely on ps3 linux?

    I think it does, but check the FAQ page (http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-PS3).

    Shoulda' read the next post first, duh.





    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%



  • Dagless
    Apr 25, 12:37 PM
    I am mentally jumping for joy!

    My newest computer is a 17" 2006 iMac. I play (some of) the latest PC games, I develop games and I edit trailers/other mid-high endery stuff. My iMac is a beast for getting through this far but it's starting to really show its age.

    As soon as the new models are out you can consider a 27" bought. Words can't express how much I'm looking forward to this.

    Looking forward to owning my first glossy display too. I imagine it's beautiful for photo editing+gaming.



    more...


    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%



  • iTravis
    Apr 26, 12:54 PM
    Well that definitely counts me out as a potential user. (Yes i'm cheap)

    I bet you're one of the users who has over 50GB of music too, right? :rolleyes:

    Sorry everything isn't free. If $20/Year is "too much" for some, maybe you guys should rethink having the internet or a cell phone as well.

    As for me this is a great deal! Regardless if it's $20/year or free I'll still use the service. And hopefully iTunes syncs better/faster. . . but I digress.





    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%



  • vincenz
    Apr 28, 05:02 PM
    Is the white iPhone being demoed in the retail stores? Surely someone can go there and compare also.



    more...


    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%



  • J Radical
    Dec 2, 09:24 AM
    OS X isn't perfect, and it's unreasonable to expect that it will never ever be breached.

    That said, Apple have done a great job thus far. My worry isn't so much individual (trivial?) exploits, but rather that OS X would go down the XP route and require constant patching. The last thing Apple needs is to have to fight fires in the same way Microsoft has had to with XP.

    Security is a key selling point for the mac platform and it is essential that Apple maintain their advantage with the vastly improved Vista fast approaching.

    I hope Apple will address these problems with the urgency they merit.





    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%



  • Applechild
    Jul 28, 12:08 PM
    Never too late.

    Isn't that what people said when Apple released the iPod - its too late... Now look.

    I'ts too late;)



    more...


    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%



  • simX
    Oct 18, 06:22 PM
    Yes, thank you. At least someone else out there is emotionally distanced enough from the iPod and the Apple entertainment sector to be a bit objective.

    Innovation: just what happened to Apple's innovative spirit when it comes to computers? The latest Mac Pro was fitted into the existing (and way oversized) G5 case. The MacBook was disappointing in that - proportionally - Apple did not shrink it at all or make it lighter than its predecessor (a design which had been in existence for about four years). There are more things, but I really don't want to sound like a troll here...

    Apple needs to come out with new computer models that are unlike anything else out there. What about a tiny, thin ultraportable? What about a smaller tower, so those of us that want a pro computer don't have to invest in an oversized monster (which is larger than any PCs in the market that I am aware of). Aren't computers supposed to get SMALLER as the technology advances? Why is Apple obsessed with making the iPod smaller and smaller, but does not care as much about its laptops and desktops?

    The answer: profit, or course. The iPod is Apple's cash cow. And this, my friends, is what I mean when I say that Apple needs to be partitioning off a little of its innovative energy that it is putting into its entertainment sector and bring it back to the computer line.

    Understood now?

    OK, now fire away :)

    *sigh* How many times do we have to refute your assertions with facts before you stop repeating them?

    To wit, the iPod is not Apple's "cash cow". By definition, if there is something that gains more revenue/profit than the iPod, then the iPod cannot be the cash cow. 58% of Apple's revenue still came from sales of Macs. Gross margins for both Macs and iPods has always been similar (hovering a bit below 30%), so the Mac also generates the majority of the profit for Apple.

    As for Apple's innovative spirit lacking when it comes to the Macs, let's just point out that it Apple updated the iPod in October 2005 to the 5th generation, and we JUST got the 5.5th generation last month. Apple took a year to add slightly brighter screens, better battery life (only for video), and games. The nano just gained the anodized aluminum exterior -- wow, Apple's reaching back to the past for it's innovation now! And the shuffle got slimmed down and consolidated into one product. All this doesn't sound exactly like innovation to me. (Of course, Apple doesn't really need to innovate, since they're already selling iPods by the boatload.)

    In contrast, Apple brought all of its Macs over to the Intel processor. The Mac Pro was dramatically higher value, what with double-wide graphics card slot, dual optical drives, 4 internal hard drive bays, etc., etc. All Macs (except for the Mac Pro) now have Front Row and a remote, which is a great feature. Built-in iSights have also migrated across the entire product line. The MacBook and MacBook Pro now have MagSafe -- a great innovation. Boot Camp is now supported on all new Macs. The Xserve has new features like lights-out management, redundant power supplies, etc. And we've seen some great things coming for Leopard, what with Time Machine and Spaces and iChat Theater and Core Animation and iCal Server, etc., etc., etc.

    It seems to me that Apple is innovating more on the Macintosh side of things than they are with the iPod. What are they going to add next on the iPod -- wireless? *gasp*, so innovative!

    Seriously, can we stop with this myth already? It's the same thing with all of Apple's "woes" with quality control (which was busted by the recent consumer reports articles where Apple has actually brought DOWN the number of new computers needing repair in their first year). It's something that's repeated ad nauseum by a few vocal people, when it's really not a problem at all. Same here: everybody gawks and writes about the iPod precisely because more people can afford it and more people can use it with whatever computer they have. So, obviously, you will hear more about the iPod.

    Let's see if repeating myself again has any effect: the iPod is not Apple's cash cow!

    Understood now?

    OK, now fire away :rolleyes:





    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%



  • Waybo
    Apr 13, 08:51 PM
    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5227/5614995836_34cb024583_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/stefanctf/5614995836/)


    I like this. I see a commercial use for this one ... I don't know what the product would be, but I see it used in an ad for something.

    Here's mine for today: Public bathrooms in Cozumel, Mexico.

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5110/5617480873_47f653a94d_b.jpg

    ISO 400, 50mm, f/4.5, 1/1000



    more...


    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%



  • jarednt1
    Jul 28, 07:59 AM
    $9,500,000,000 - that's just sitting around in cash with no long term debt. I think Apple's got plenty of "stamina"...

    Yes however MS can try and fight it out for much longer, they have about 3 times that in cash and no long term debt as well. I can see this makeing some really kick a** iPods.





    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%



  • it5five
    Oct 24, 08:56 AM
    Finally, no more need for 600 threads about the C2D MacBook Pros.

    Of course, now we're going to get 600 threads about the C2D MacBooks. :(



    more...


    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%



  • Virtualball
    Mar 31, 10:29 AM
    Wow, that's unbearably ugly. Looks like we're heading to Tiger's level of random UI elements, right? :(





    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%



  • WestonHarvey1
    Apr 22, 09:46 AM
    I still haven't seen the "killer app" that makes this higher mobile speed something I can't wait another year for. I know that's not the smartest way of looking at it - the higher speeds bring the innovations we haven't imagined yet. But I'm not seeing them on the Android platform, either.

    It seems to mostly benefit tethering - but tethering benefits other devices and not the mobile handled experience.

    Fast access to these new cloud music storage services is interesting, but the data caps practically kill their usefulness.



    more...


    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%



  • robeddie
    Apr 21, 07:14 PM
    So your link is to an article where the writer has no clue why it wasn't done? Not very useful. Again, I don't get why people don't get this. A backlight keyboard takes more room. Not a lot but some. The new MBAs are thinner with larger batteries than the first. Seems pretty reasonable it wouldn't fit. Note this is Apple, which do you think they would chose, thinner or a backlight keyboard?

    Cool. Then in a couple months, when the new macbook air is released and its as thin, or thinner than the current model AND includes a backlit keyboard, you'll come back here and admit you were ignorant, right?





    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%



  • grassland
    Apr 3, 03:34 PM
    caught in the garden





    arnold palmer hospital building. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%



  • PghLondon
    Apr 28, 11:26 AM
    This is fun.
    Yes, the iPhone does compete against Android. The last time I went into a AT&T or Verizon store, this was obvious. To say that the iPhone does not compete against Android is silly.

    WRONG. iPhone = hardware. Android = software.
    iOS competes against Android.

    Because there is only two hardware choices, the iPhone 4 or iPhone 3GS. Making this argument is so empty, in that it does not take into account the reasons behind it.


    WRONG. The choice is iPhone OR any Android phone OR any Win7 Phone OR any RIM phone, etc.

    Hello Mr. Straw man. The article was about iPhone; if you read it it states "covering U.S. mobile phone sales". Now, if by mobile OS, you are also adding in the iPad, that is debatable. I've been a iPad 3G owner since April 30th and I can tell you that I do not consider the iPad a mobile device. Sure, its easy to carry, but to lump in its sales with phone handset sales is a stretch. If you are making that stretch, how about adding netbooks into the mix as well?


    If those netbooks ran Android, I'd count them. But they don't. And YOU'RE bringing up straw men? Phone versus non-phone makes no difference if they're running the same OS and same apps.


    When your sales numbers for phones are ~50% of that of your competitor; whereas a few years ago they were barely a blip, then yes that means they are getting kicked in the teeth in handset OS sales.

    In your mind maybe. But only in your mind.

    PS: Handset OS sales? What the hell does that mean?





    CorvusCamenarum
    May 2, 01:11 AM
    I'm not sure stuffing a corpse with candy is very hygienic.
    Who said anything about candy?

    Seriously, though, we're going to treat him like Hector? Like he was some great hero worthy of our wrath and opprobrium?
    Not a hero, but obviously worth our wrath and opprobrium, given that we spent 10 years trying to find him.

    I disagree, we should wrap him in an army blanket and bury Bin Laden in an unmarked grave; the man's had enough celebrity already.
    In a flower print dress and petticoat hiked up to his waist with his bare ass facing Mecca, maybe. He was a crapsack who got his jollies from murdered innocents, and deserves to be humiliated.

    I like it! And after they're done Obama can piss on his corpse! :D

    Hmm..what's Pfc England and her cohorts up to these days?





    BC2009
    Apr 14, 11:45 AM
    I'm going to speculate here. Lion is the eighth release of OS X. Perhaps the ninth release will support touchscreens and iOS apps.

    I envision something like the Macbook Air with a touchscreen and reversible hinge (like the early 2000s Windows tablets, but a much cleaner design) that could run OS X and iOS apps. The Air is already not much bigger than an iPad.

    Now, if Apple is internally working on something like this, and wanted to test existing apps from the store, then the alpha OS would need to be supported in the store. Of course, Apple probably intended to hide the string that IDs the compatibility, but sometimes mistakes happen.

    Or, of course, the whole thing could be an accident/bug and it means nothing at all.

    could be a touch panel iMac...

    So Apple does in fact have a patent or patent application for a hinged iMac that can transition from an upright position to a near-flat angled position for touch-based operation. Several have also done notebook computers with a swivel hinge or a flip screen to make it double as a tablet.





    citi
    Mar 31, 11:28 AM
    Making it look different won't make it better. They should address the usability/functionality, sure.

    It looks like they have. It you've used the iPads calendar app, it's much better than what we have in OSX. I mean, finally an agenda view!





    Vegasman
    Apr 26, 01:00 PM
    so instead you're going to store them all on multiple machines? what do you think the cloud is for? lol

    Uh no...

    You need to follow the thread. The poster was using his 2 TB drive as his cloud using a 5$ software.





    PghLondon
    May 1, 05:27 AM
    Of course there is. iOS runs on two currently available Apple smartphone models: 3GS and 4. The iOS that runs on these phones is sufficiently different in feature sets from the iOS that runs on Tablets, media consumption devices, and Apple TVs:
    -Larger resolution on tablets
    -Communications handled separately - No phone app or visual voicemail on Tablet or iPod Touch
    -No installable apps on Apple TV


    AppleTV isn't being counted. If it had apps, it would be. For now, while it's running iOS "under the hood", Apple and analysts aren't actually mentioning that or using it in counts.

    And the differences between iPad / iPod / iPhone are orders of magnitude less than the differences between the ultra-high and ultra-low ends of what is being counted as Android "phones".

    This whole "smartphone OS" is something dreamed up in the last few weeks by Android apologists, after the numbers showed that Apple has the most popular OS and the most popular piece(s) of hardware in the mobile industry.